Researchers given little say in drug company test trials


Ghostwriting under the microscope

Ghostwriting is frowned upon by academics — unless they are doing it themselves. Sergio Sismondo, who has studied the subject, says professors have been rewarded for such behaviour. Academics, he says, are under pressure to publish as many articles as possible to enhance their standing within their universities.

It’s a practice often shorthanded as “publish or perish.”“The university world is very demanding about research production,” says Sismondo, a philosophy professor at Queen’s University.

The pressure is especially high in medical circles. “So they just keep churning out the articles.” Besides using ghostwriters, academics can add to their publication credits by claiming to be the second, third or even fourth author of a study. Such honorary authorships, as they are known, are often given to department managers or those securing a study’s funding, but have little — if anything — to do with writing the article.

Sismondo became suspicious of academic publishing after reviewing the resumé of a fellow scholar claiming to have published some 800 articles over his career, at a rate of about one a week or so, allowing for time off for vacations.

“That’s just not possible,” he says.


Medical studies may or may not be truthful. None of the statements made in medical studies are traceable. You read frequently in your daily newspaper that publication of medical studies is controlled through contracts by those who pay for the studies. You will find confirmation of this on the internet. Dr. Marcia Angell, M.D. was the editor of The New England Journal of Medicine and had this to say: “Physicians can no longer rely on the medical literature for valid and reliable information. This is the conclusion I reluctantly reached toward the end of my two decades as editor”.

Back